When companies as big as T-Mobile and Sprint talk about joining forces, it invariably causes some concern. Will the company be too big? Will it hurt the market? Will consumers benefit from the merger? What will it mean for the industry as a whole?
While no one can accurately predict the answers to those questions, we know enough to make some educated guesses. What we want to talk about here is how the potential T-Mobile Sprint merger could affect you, the wireless customer.
As of right now, the T-Mobile Sprint merger is simply a possibility. Although both companies have agreed to merge and are working hard to make it happen, the merger will need full regulatory approval before it can be finalized, and that hasn’t happened — at least not yet.
With that in mind, here is what has happened so far:
It’s actually incredibly simple: Verizon and AT&T are both so much bigger than both Sprint and T-Mobile. As such, the carriers are in two separate battles — rather than one big fight with all four carriers going against each other, it’s really more like a fight between AT&T and Verizon at the top and a fight between T-Mobile and Sprint at the bottom.
If Sprint and T-Mobile join forces to become one company, the fight will then be between three companies of similar size. This makes more sense from a business standpoint as it will give the T-Mobile-Sprint company a fair hand in the fight.
The wireless industry was far different four years ago than it is now. For one, T-Mobile was the fourth-largest carrier for a long time, and the original merger talks were about Sprint buying T-Mobile. However, mainly due to CEO John Legere’s “no B.S.” attitude and the Uncarrier changes made at T-Mobile, Sprint is now the fourth-largest carrier with T-Mobile in third.
That first proposal of Sprint acquiring T-Mobile was squashed because the government under the Obama administration thought T-Mobile’s competitive edge was good for the industry as a whole. In 2017, a new deal was offered where the companies would merge instead of T-Mobile ceding control to Sprint. This deal ultimately fell apart because T-Mobile wanted more control than Sprint was willing to give.
Now, this current deal gives most of the control of the merged company to John Legere and T-Mobile, which makes far more sense since T-Mobile is doing so much better than Sprint in so many ways. In fact, this proposed new company would merely be T-Mobile, with the Sprint brand dissolving away.
It depends on how you look at it. Take a look at the graph below, which shows how the “Big Four” wireless carriers stack up to each other when it comes to their subscriber base. The information comes from Fierce Wireless, and represents numbers from the final quarter of 2017:
Clearly, T-Mobile and Sprint don’t have a prayer against AT&T and Verizon. Outside of some sort of miracle, neither Sprint nor T-Mobile would ever match the big dogs’ numbers.
But, take a look at the subscriber count of the “Big Three,” should this T-Mobile Sprint merger go through:
As you can see, you have three companies which are relatively the same size, giving T-Mobile the ability to maybe become the nation’s second-largest carrier (possibly even the largest). In theory, rather than make the industry less competitive, things would actually get more competitive.
The big difference between the wireless carriers and cable companies is that no wireless carrier has any large area of the United States monopolized. In the small city I live in, for example, we have one choice for cable/internet service: Comcast. That’s not just for my area of town; that’s the entire city.
But I can get service from any of the four wireless carriers I choose. One company might be better for me than another, whether due to speed, reliability, or price. That competition is what keeps prices down and innovation up.
The merger of Sprint and T-Mobile won’t change that. If anything, Verizon and AT&T will have to drastically alter their business plans because T-Mobile will suddenly be a much more potent threat to their subscriber counts than it currently already is.
Hypothetically, at least at the beginning, this new deal wouldn’t cause monopolies; it would likely cause the opposite.
Nothing. If this deal goes through, it will take years for things to change. The deal won’t even be finalized until 2019, and T-Mobile estimates it would take about three years to migrate subscribers from the Sprint network to the T-Mobile network.
T-Mobile, historically, has been pretty good about honoring grandfathered plans, at least for a certain amount of time. One can thus assume your plan pricing and details at the onset of the merger would remain in effect at least until the merger is complete.
Your phone may or may not work after the merger. Sprint is a CDMA network, and T-Mobile is GSM, and most phones can’t work on both networks. With a few exceptions, anyone with a Sprint phone will have to switch to a GSM phone once the merger is done.
However, since this merger’s completion is years away, the phone you have in the future could be different from the phone you have today. I wouldn’t worry too much about it for now.
A few government organizations will have to sign off on the deal in order for it to become official. The wildly unpredictable Trump administration could go either way with this T-Mobile Sprint merger.
On the one hand, it is likely that the merger will cause the United States to lose a lot of jobs. After all, the newly formed T-Mobile won’t need two of every employee, so a lot of the Sprint personnel will likely be laid off. Trump doesn’t like the loss of jobs, so he might squash the deal on that ground alone.
However, the merger could mean a boost for the rollout of 5G. Earlier in 2018, Trump squashed the potential deal between Broadcom and Qualcomm, pretty much on the basis that American companies need to have a grip on future technology like 5G. Trump might hear the new T-Mobile will be bringing the 5G heat and accept the deal.
Ultimately, we have no idea what could happen. However, it’s clear that T-Mobile and Sprint wouldn’t have agreed to merge if they didn’t have a good idea that the deal would be approved. We’ll just have to wait and see.
According to both Sprint and T-Mobile, the combined company’s resources would enable a faster and more efficient 5G rollout. After all, if you take the work that T-Mobile has already done towards rolling out 5G and add it to what Sprint has already done, you get a big jump in progress.
There’s also the question of spectrum ownership. In order to provide wireless service, companies have to lease spectrum from the government. T-Mobile owns some, and so does Sprint, but the merged company will own both collections. That means better coverage and better speeds across the board, even before the rollout of 5G.
Once again, this will enable the new T-Mobile to better compete with Verizon and AT&T.
This is the big concern with the merger. Like I said, at first it will only be good for consumers as the new T-Mobile will be a force to be reckoned with. But after the dust settles, it could come to pass that new tiers of pricing get introduced by all three carriers surrounding 5G, and then the playing field is leveled.
In other words, T-Mobile could announce a new 5G plan which is far more expensive than its current plans (premium service equals premium pricing). Verizon and AT&T would put out similar plans at similar price points, creating a new, higher tier of pricing. As 4G gets phased out, we all end up spending more money than we did before. The three companies continue to compete on pricing, but the prices never drop to the current level they are at now.
How high those prices will be is anyone’s guess. However, the question we should be asking is this: would that scenario not happen if things remained as they are today? I don’t really think so. I believe no matter what, 5G service will be more expensive than 4G service is now, and for the first few years, we will all pay more.
The question then becomes this: will you be paying Verizon and AT&T a lot of money for high-quality 5G service while paying T-Mobile or Sprint a bit less money for low-quality 5G service? Or, will you pay a more middle-ground higher pricing for high-quality 5G service with three companies of equal size competing?
If you ask me, the latter option is better than the former. Other folks may not agree.
We should find out in the next few months whether or not this deal will even be approved. If it gets accepted, it will be years before things start to take effect, so ultimately nothing changes for now.
Looking forward, the wireless industry is only going to become more critical to our daily lives, even more than it already is. Do you want four companies fighting it out where the two smallest don’t stand a chance against the two most prominent, or do you want three companies which could overtake one another at any moment?
With something as important as our mobile data, I vote for the Big Three. Let us know in the comments which side of the fence you are on!
Google has announced the official app for the upcoming Android Dev Summit. The app presents a schedule of all of the conference’s events and lets you livestream the conference. The app also works as an Instant App, which lets you use the app without fully downloading it onto your device. With Google’s Android Developer Summit...
This week’s poll wanted to find out if the new OnePlus 6T could compete against the big boys, as we pit it against the also-new Google Pixel 3 (and the XL).It was a simple question: which is better? It’s an interesting comparison because the two approach the task of being the perfect Android smartphone quite differently. There...