As you read this, Microsoft is jockeying for position with Apple for the title of world’s most valuable tech company – something that hasn’t happened since 2010, when the Zune was still a thing. The two are roughly neck-and-neck, with each worth about $850 billion, plus or minus a couple of billion dollars, and each overtaking the other at different points during trading this week.
It’s easy to blame this turn of events on a slumping Apple, as the signs of weakening iPhone demand keep piling up, putting the hurt on the tech titan’s stock. But as much as this reversal of fortunes can be attributed to Apple’s stumbles, don’t overlook the fact that it’s also due in very large part to Microsoft’s renewed strength.
In short, it’s starting to look like Microsoft’s slow-but-steady growth in “boring” software and services for businesses is looking more attractive to Wall Street than Apple’s reliance on the sexy, huge-but-volatile consumer market.
When Satya Nadella took the CEO reins almost five years ago, it wasn’t long before he called his shot: Microsoft would stop throwing good money after bad into dead ends like Windows on smartphones, and start focusing on fast-growing businesses like the Microsoft Azure cloud and the Office 365 subscription service.
And, frankly, the follow-through has been a little boring for anyone who hasn’t gotten rich from the fact that Microsoft stock keeps reaching all-time highs. Analysts expect Microsoft to show strong growth in its cloud businesses – and quarter after quarter, Microsoft delivers. All told, Microsoft posted $114 million in revenue for its 2018 fiscal year, up 14% from the year prior, with $23 billion of that from its various cloud businesses.
It’s not as exciting as the launch of a new iPhone; customers aren’t literally lining up around the block to try new AI services for the Microsoft Azure cloud, or placing preorders for its super-secure version of Linux for connected gadgetry.
Still, it’s in hot demand. Companies large and small are turning to cloud platforms like Azure to reduce their reliance on their own servers and data centers, which has the dual benefits of reducing costs while letting them modernize their business. These buyers are famously deep-pocketed, and willing to commit to long-term contracts that keep Microsoft in the black for the long haul.
Furthermore, this model keeps Microsoft nice and insulated from several trends that have come to work against Apple. There’s no seasonality to the cloud business; multinational corporations aren’t much more likely to buy Office in the holiday quarter versus the summer. Plus, Apple is operating under threats from the Trump administration to place a tariff as high as 10% on the iPhone. Microsoft’s core products, offered via the internet, aren’t prone to the same.
Oh, sure, Microsoft still has a strong consumer brand, particularly with Windows operating system, Xbox video game systems, and its Surface hardware lineup. Some of those products, especially the Surface laptops, go right up against Apple. The difference, though, is that for Microsoft, these initiatives are often-lucrative and strategically-important side businesses; for Apple, selling devices (and services like iCloud and Apple Music to go with them) is the whole ballgame.
Ultimately, though, the ongoing success of Microsoft under Nadella is a reflection of the motto of the famed Y Combinator startup program: Make something people want. It’s just that in this case, the people who want it are the big spenders at large corporations, not the kinds of super-fans who buy a new phone on launch day every year. Besides, Microsoft isn’t under the same kind of regulatory scrutiny as a Google or Facebook.
So while it’s definitely possible that Apple recovers its footing, launches a blockbuster new iPhone, and gets back to being a $1 trillion company again, don’t sleep on the fact that what Microsoft has accomplished is an extraordinary turnaround in its own right, with momentum that is very likely going to keep building. One isn’t necessarily better than the other, but they’re both very strong and not at all mutually exclusive.
If it feels like there’s more YouTube videos about franchises like Red Dead Redemption, Grand Theft Auto and Fortnite than there is around Mario Party, The Legend of Zelda and Pokemon, it probably has something to do with the Creators Program, a policy instituted by Nintendo that squirreled away up to 40% of a YouTube...